Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Silvio Greco's avatar

The silence may be the most interesting part, but I’m not sure it tells us much. An artist can choose not to explain; the people who put the work there can simply say nothing. From the pavement, those two silences look exactly the same.

Even if the distortions were deliberate, there’s still a separate public-space question: not just who made it, but who decided it belonged there. AI can blur authorship. It needn’t blur responsibility.

Painted Journals's avatar

Maybe I missed something, but when you say generated by AI, you mean it was created with prompts through AI image generation program like midjourney? And the actual mural is printed out and then glued to the wall?

I think all AI generated art is just copyright theft. What else could it be?

But I also think it doesn’t matter. AI well probably destroy the business of real human created public art and illustration. Even things like advertising photography. Because most people don’t care or even see the difference.

What will remain is the things created for the love of it.

And if you don’t know about it, if you ever do make it to Brooklyn for a few months, make sure you take a train down to Philadelphia and see some of the thousands of murals in that town. I spent days there looking at them, and saw just a fraction.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?